<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maggie Q</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html</link>
	<description>Celebrity Shoe Sizes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:33:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ctd</title>
		<link>http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html/comment-page-1#comment-16393</link>
		<dc:creator>ctd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html#comment-16393</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bad we have virtually no solid info to go by here, while the evidence sits right there in that last picture. ( this one: http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/images/q/maggie_q-shoes-4b.jpg )

I&#039;ve been playing with it in Photoshop for a while and I&#039;m fairly certain the size says either 8 1/2 or 9 1/2, but it&#039;s not clear enough to make a decisive call. I also have not been able to found a larger version of said picture, which is a real shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad we have virtually no solid info to go by here, while the evidence sits right there in that last picture. ( this one: <a href="http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/images/q/maggie_q-shoes-4b.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/images/q/maggie_q-shoes-4b.jpg</a> )</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been playing with it in Photoshop for a while and I&#8217;m fairly certain the size says either 8 1/2 or 9 1/2, but it&#8217;s not clear enough to make a decisive call. I also have not been able to found a larger version of said picture, which is a real shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lalalala</title>
		<link>http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html/comment-page-1#comment-12586</link>
		<dc:creator>lalalala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html#comment-12586</guid>
		<description>i wonder how big feets she have in the &quot;swedish way&quot;, in cm ... is it 40 ?:o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder how big feets she have in the &#8220;swedish way&#8221;, in cm &#8230; is it 40 ?:o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripper</title>
		<link>http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html/comment-page-1#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebrityshoesize.com/q/maggie-q-453.html#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>She has very very large and big Feet for her Height !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She has very very large and big Feet for her Height !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
